The Representation of Women in New Turkish Cinema Essay

The Representation of Women in New Turkish Cinema - Essay Example The improvement in the popularity of the movies is seen as a greater contrast with the yester years of the Turkish movies. This has seen the rise of new directors into the film industry who immensely contributed to a new wave of the Turkish cinema. The local nature of the cinema most often is portrayed meaning movies that exhibit unique cultural fundamentals and terms of Turkish custom, amusement and historical context, could be grounds that viewers are drawn to these general movies of regional directors. These features are striking for a social order that wishes to identify themselves in movies but also nationality and distinctiveness in all its descriptions, profiles and forms are linked to this particular acknowledgment in cinema. However, New Turkish cinema has been hit by a wave of criticism over the representation of women. Presently, women are still being represented pessimistically in Turkish cinema. According to the observation of the various movies by Zeki Demirkubuzâ€℠¢s, the role of women has considerably been ignored by the fact that these movies put emphasis on the male characters. Failure to include women in these movies has sparkled protest on the representation of the male perspective and impartiality in the female role. In spite, the poor representation of women in the movies, prostitution prevails as a subtheme for most movies. The absence can be attributed to be negative in relation to gender politics. These films have profoundly subordinated women to men. The absence is a representation of the patriarchal practices that are still prevalence within the Turkish society. This has never been in any way considered a coincidence as there female parts are extremely silenced. However, in reviews, the issue of silencing of women has never been addressed but only in a few articles around Turkey (Dadak & Kostepen, 2007). The case of imitating patriarchal customs is the basis of debates surrounding Zeki Demirkubuz movies. Demirkubuz’s role i n challenging or reproducing patriarchy is indistinguishable. In a dialogue, with Altyaz? magazine, Zeki Demirkubuz castoffs that he does not include women in most of his movies; however he rejects feminist consideration of the person focusing on patriarchal affairs, sexism and male aggression (Ziraman, 2008). Demirkubuz’s declaration makes evident that he is not behind the patriarchal aggression on women, and physical, as well as spoken violence wielded on prostitutes (Operli & F?rat, 2007). The existence of patriarchal associations between actors, insults and domestic violence can be understood as awkward analysis of the social order, which is also subjected by gender social orders and patriarchy. Possible tribulations faced by women such as infidelity, rape, domestic brutality, rumors about morality are revealed in the movie in a normal way, which can be understood as the upholding of the patriarchy. The female standpoints and stories are set aside in most of these movies a complete show of the patriarchal practices. Turkish cinema can be considered a better source to understand the females struggle against silence in an attempt to ensure equality, as well as their identity (Ulusoy, 2010). Conversely, women feel lost within the dominated society where they are discriminated against (Umut, 2009). Despite the inclusion of women in various movies, they get included because they

Critically analyse the case of WPBSA v Hendry Essay

Critically analyse the case of WPBSA v Hendry - Essay Example ording to the UK Sport Equality Statement (2008), â€Å"equality is about recognising and removing the barriers faced by people involved or wanting to be involved in any sport.† This legal position would help promote competition within the sporting sector. Basically, there should be freedom of entry or exit within a sporting sector where there would be no barriers. In the above case study, competition is virtually restricted under the agreement between WPBSA and players such that any unsanctioned tournament would amount to infringement of the law which creates monopoly. It is worth noting that the value of sport can greatly help improve the delivery of a wide rage of benefits socially and even economically. Thus, according to the EU Commission, which passed a white paper in July 2007 on sport, there is need to raise awareness on the positive impacts such as the social function of unifying different people, the positive economic impact as well as the need to promote good governance through the provision of a culture that gives freedom to everyone to be involved in sport. In view of the above case, there is need for other regulatory bodies to design regulations that promote a competitive environment in a particular sporting field such as snooker in this particular case. Competition is always healthy in any commercial market where many actors would help improve the overall performance of the whole sector. Monopolizing of a particular sector of the market often give an undesirable element where other competitors are sidelined on the basis of particular regulations that govern sporting activities in any given country. In my own opinion, I think the statutory legal framework should also cater for other competitors such that they would not be restricted to participate in any particular sector of the market. The sport governing bodies should not be vested with ultimate, absolute powers to oversee and control all sectors of a sporting market which would promote monopoly